The Great Plotnik

Friday, June 06, 2008

The HDS Backlash


So, after a mild, ah, discussion with The Great Ducknik this morning, Plotnik has to admit to his readers that the Gender Gap is real.

The subject was Hillary's Disaffected Supporters, which to Plotnik appears to mean women who became attached on many levels to Senator Clinton's campaign for the nomination. When this campaign did not achieve victory it served to kick up frustrations and angers that have long been lingering not that far under the surface.

It is not enough for Plotnik to simply repeat what he, and, he imagines, most men would want to say here: Someone has to win. Someone has to lose. He won. She lost. Stop whining.

Because we are not talking about the nomination, which is tangible. We are talking about what is intangible, all the slights and comments, many of them purposeful but just as bad when they are inadvertent, the burrs under the saddle that don't add up to much one by one but over the long haul begin to blister. Women have felt it and stayed quiet, but they are sick and tired of staying quiet. Blisters hurt, and then they fester.

(Plotnik knows he can't say 'whining.' He can't say 'emotional.' These are loaded words.)

(He can say 'asshole,' because that's only derogatory to men, and he can say 'tall and skinny,' which is how Barack Obama was described, and he can say 'he looks like a pencil with big ears,' because these aren't derogatory to men, but he can't say 'short and squat' because that is derogatory to women.)

(And he absolutely can't throw up his hands in frustration when this is explained to him and say "CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS SHIT?" because, yes, he'd better believe it.)

The Great Ducknik asks where are the women leaders? After Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi and less than half a dozen female CEOs, where is the next generation who will provide the solidarity and the insistence that women's issues be dealt with fairly? The issues that were issues at the beginning of the women's movement are still issues today: unequal pay, government staying out of reproductive rights and men and women respecting each other's differences.

What Plotnik says is that this discussion has been advanced a hundredfold by the 2008 battle for the Democratic Nomination. Women's anger is being vented at husbands in bedrooms across America this very morning, and not just by Hillary supporters. The Great Ducknik stopped supporting Clinton when her campaign and her husband got too nasty, but this doesn't mean she abandons the cause.

If men still don't get it, they are going to have it explained to them. We don't like it, trust Plottie, but tough noogies. It's time to shut up, listen and learn.

-------

Why a Mary Cassatt painting? No one in 1890 could recognize Mary Cassatt as a great painter because she painted domestic scenes. Women were basically ignored in the Impressionist world.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 11:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ducknik suggests that prior to any more conversations about women seeking power, readers should take a look at Judith Warner's comment in today's New York Times or just take in this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-IrhRSwF9U&eurl=http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2008/05/27/sexism_sells/

 
At 12:44 PM, Blogger DAK said...

I watched it. It's embarrassing. These guys are there to sell ad time for men's products. It's mostly Fox News. What would anyone expect? And why are any of them still working?

But I guess I'm not sure how I, or Barack Obama, is to be blamed for these big-mouthed fools.

 
At 3:00 PM, Blogger Karen said...

Basically, men are animals. I have two words for all of this: Totally threatened. (With the exception of TGP, of course, which is why he doesn't really understand the issue.)

 
At 4:29 PM, Blogger mary ann said...

Thank you Plottie and 455 thank yous to the Great Ducknik. I have stormed out of the TV room so many times these past months. Here from the President of NOW.

Yes, Hillary Clinton persevered to win contest after contest, despite the ridicule, scorn and derision that was heaped on her by the frat-boy commentariat, and we salute her courage and determination not to allow the self-important pundit class to drum her out of the race with their endless name-calling. But will that treatment be the norm for women who run in the future? Has it become acceptable?

Television commentary on her voice, her laugh, her clapping, her clothing, even her ankles - not to mention calling her a bitch and a she-devil, and comparing her to a crazed murderer, a hated ex-wife or a scolding mother - became so commonplace that we came to expect it. And Hillary rose above it, as we knew she would, but it took a toll on her campaign and on all of us. We should vow today, here and now, that we will not allow the media to do it to any woman ever again.

 
At 3:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would have respected HRC a LOT more if she had the self-respect to divorce that amoral clown of a husband who made a mockery of their marriage multiple times. But she stayed with him, not for love, but because of political ambition. I can't respect that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home